Dental Implant Courses
Surgical Instruction Series Bundle
8 CE Hours
This extensive surgical bundle features 5 courses with a total of 11 in-depth video lessons covering advanced techniques in implant dentistry and tissue regeneration.
Buy Now
$2,975
Only $2,895





Online Regenerative Dentistry Courses

Platelet Rich Fibrin (PRF) in Regenerative Dentistry
Advanced dental implant courses designed for real clinical practice
Dental implant courses at Pikos Institute are live continuing education programs developed for clinicians seeking structured, in-depth training in dental implantology and surgical implant dentistry. These dental implant courses focus on clinical decision-making, procedural sequencing, and hands-on execution required to place dental implants predictably across a wide range of patient presentations.
Unlike short workshops or technique-specific seminars, Pikos Institute’s implant education emphasizes comprehensive treatment workflows. Instruction integrates diagnosis, surgical planning, hard and soft tissue management, implant placement, and restorative coordination to reflect how implant cases unfold in real clinical settings. Courses are taught by experienced faculty through live instruction, surgical observation, guided discussion, and structured clinical analysis.
Each implant program within the course curriculum is designed to address a specific clinical focus or experience level. Some courses emphasize foundational implant concepts, while others explore advanced surgical solutions for complex anatomical challenges. Together, these programs form a progressive educational pathway that supports clinicians as they expand skills, refine judgment, and improve consistency in surgical implant dentistry.
These courses serve implant dentists, oral and maxillofacial surgeons, periodontists, and prosthodontists seeking implant training that bridges theory with hands-on application. The overarching goal is to help clinicians deliver predictable outcomes while reducing complications, improving efficiency, and strengthening long-term treatment success in daily clinical practice.


What you’ll develop through live implant training and implant education
Surgical implant dentistry requires more than technical execution alone. Successful outcomes depend on careful planning, anatomical awareness, coordinated sequencing, and the ability to adapt intraoperatively when variables change. These live courses provide structured implantology training that reflects the complexity of real clinical care.
Participants develop skills and understanding in areas such as:
- Patient evaluation and risk assessment for implant treatment
- Surgical planning based on anatomy, restorative requirements, and prosthetic endpoints
- Implant placement strategies across single-tooth, multi-unit, and full-arch cases
- Hard and soft tissue management to support long-term implant stability
- Immediate placement and loading considerations
- Surgical complication recognition and management
- Coordination between surgical and restorative phases of care
Instruction emphasizes why decisions are made at each step, not just how procedures are performed. Faculty explain how early diagnostic assumptions influence implant positioning, how positioning affects prosthetic design, and how prosthetic design impacts long-term maintenance and patient comfort.
Rather than presenting isolated techniques, the education focuses on repeatable workflows that can be applied consistently across cases. This approach helps clinicians reduce variability, improve predictability, and gain confidence when managing increasingly complex implant scenarios.
Implant education designed for progressive surgical development
These dental implant courses are designed to support clinicians at different stages of experience. While some programs introduce foundational principles of implant dentistry, others explore advanced implant surgery techniques and complex treatment planning scenarios.
The curriculum supports progressive learning by:
- Providing clear frameworks for diagnosis and case selection
- Reinforcing surgical principles that scale with experience
- Encouraging responsible adoption of advanced techniques
- Emphasizing when to proceed, when to modify, and when to refer
This structure allows clinicians to build skills incrementally without encouraging premature escalation into complex procedures. Less experienced providers gain clarity around foundational implantology concepts, while experienced surgeons refine decision-making, workflow efficiency, and long-term case planning.

Got questions?We’ve got answers
Advanced education supports long-term success by strengthening how clinicians evaluate, plan, and sequence treatment rather than focusing solely on procedural execution. When clinicians understand how early decisions influence downstream outcomes, they are better positioned to prevent complications that may not become apparent until months or years later.
A structured educational foundation also promotes consistency across cases. Instead of relying on intuition alone, clinicians develop planning frameworks that can be adapted to different patient presentations while maintaining predictable outcomes. This hands-on training consistency supports clearer communication with patients, more efficient collaboration between phases of care, and improved documentation and follow-up processes.
Over time, this approach reduces uncertainty and cognitive load in clinical decision-making. When treatment choices are guided by sound reasoning and experience-based frameworks, clinicians are better equipped to manage variation, respond to unexpected findings, and sustain high-quality outcomes throughout the course of their professional careers.
Prosthetic planning plays a central role because long-term success depends on how surgical decisions support function, hygiene access, and serviceability over time. When restorative considerations are addressed early, surgical execution becomes more predictable and the likelihood of downstream compromise is reduced.
Education that integrates restorative goals into planning helps clinicians think beyond the surgical moment and visualize the full treatment arc. Factors such as restorative space, emergence profile design, and functional loading all influence positioning decisions in ways that directly affect patient comfort and long-term maintenance.
By understanding this relationship, clinicians are better equipped to coordinate care across phases and communicate effectively with restorative partners. This alignment improves efficiency, reduces the need for corrective procedures, and supports outcomes that remain functional and manageable long after active treatment is complete.
Yes. Advanced education often explores multiple approaches for managing challenging situations, particularly when conventional strategies introduce unnecessary risk. Rather than presenting alternatives as universal solutions, instruction emphasizes evaluating suitability based on patient-specific considerations.
Clinicians learn to assess biological factors, functional demands, and long-term prognosis when selecting a pathway. This includes understanding when staged approaches may offer greater predictability, or when modification reduces the likelihood of downstream compromise.
Exposure to alternative strategies expands clinical perspective while reinforcing restraint. The emphasis remains on selecting the most appropriate approach for a given situation rather than applying techniques indiscriminately, supporting a conservative and outcome-focused mindset.
Case-based learning provides insight into how decisions evolve across an entire treatment sequence rather than focusing on isolated steps or idealized scenarios. By examining complete cases from initial evaluation through follow-up, clinicians gain clarity on how diagnosis, planning, execution, and long-term considerations interact in real clinical contexts.
Walkthroughs help illustrate why plans change, how risk accumulates across phases, and where early assumptions influence later outcomes. They also reveal how experienced clinicians reassess information as new variables emerge, adjust sequencing when conditions differ from expectations, and respond thoughtfully to limitations rather than forcing a predetermined approach.
This format emphasizes reasoning, adaptability, and judgment rather than procedural memorization. For many clinicians, the greatest benefit is learning how to think through uncertainty with greater confidence. Understanding how complex scenarios are evaluated supports clearer patient communication, better anticipation of challenges, and more deliberate decision-making before issues become clinically significant or difficult to correct.
Team-based education acknowledges that outcomes are shaped by coordination across roles, not just individual execution. When surgical, restorative, and support perspectives are aligned, treatment tends to proceed more smoothly and with fewer disruptions throughout the care process.
Education that highlights this dynamic helps clinicians understand how their decisions affect workflows beyond their immediate role. Improved communication reduces misalignment between phases of care, minimizes delays or rework, and supports more efficient use of time and resources. This alignment also contributes to a more cohesive and reassuring patient experience.
Shared understanding strengthens follow-up and maintenance processes as well. When teams operate from a common framework, expectations are clearer, responsibilities are better defined, and long-term care becomes easier to manage. Over time, this collaborative approach supports more consistent outcomes and reduces the likelihood of preventable complications.
Technique-focused training often concentrates on execution without fully addressing the clinical context in which decisions are made. Comprehensive education integrates technique within broader reasoning, helping clinicians understand when, why, and how to apply specific approaches responsibly.
This adaptability prepares clinicians to manage real-world variability rather than idealized cases. Education delivered through structured programs, including exposure to implant certification pathways and even online implant learning components, supports consistency across different learning environments.
By emphasizing systems, sequencing, and decision-making, comprehensive education prepares clinicians to manage complexity with confidence and consistency. Rather than excelling only under ideal conditions, clinicians are equipped to deliver predictable outcomes across a wide range of clinical situations.
Complex cases often become challenging not because of a single technical obstacle, but because multiple variables interact over time. Education that emphasizes sequencing and risk evaluation helps clinicians recognize these interactions earlier, before minor issues compound into larger complications.
Through structured case discussion and comparative analysis, clinicians gain insight into how experienced providers assess limitations, weigh alternatives, and adjust plans as conditions evolve. This type of learning accelerates pattern recognition, allowing clinicians to identify warning signs and decision points that may not be obvious in isolation.
As clinical complexity increases, whether due to anatomical constraints, functional demands, or patient-specific factors, this deeper understanding becomes increasingly valuable. Confidence is built not through memorization of techniques, but through the ability to evaluate tradeoffs and select approaches that prioritize long-term stability, maintainability, and patient safety.
Anatomical variability is one of the most consistent challenges in clinical practice, and education addresses this by strengthening evaluation skills rather than promoting uniform solutions. Clinicians learn to identify limitations before selecting an approach, rather than adapting reactively once treatment has begun.
Through imaging interpretation, case review, and discussion of non-ideal presentations, clinicians develop a more nuanced understanding of factors that influence predictability. These may include bone morphology, spatial constraints, tissue characteristics, and proximity to critical structures.
Improved risk assessment supports better case selection and sequencing decisions. Over time, clinicians become more comfortable modifying plans, staging treatment, or choosing referral when appropriate. These decisions ultimately support safer care and more consistent outcomes across a broad range of clinical scenarios.
Long-term outcomes depend heavily on how treatment is maintained after completion. Education addresses this by integrating maintenance considerations into planning, rather than treating follow-up as a separate or secondary phase that begins only after treatment delivery. This mindset encourages clinicians to think ahead and anticipate how decisions made early will affect care years later.
Clinicians learn how design choices influence hygiene access, retrievability, and long-term monitoring. Discussion often includes recognizing early indicators of biological or mechanical issues, understanding how subtle changes in tissue response or function may signal emerging problems, and knowing when intervention is warranted to prevent escalation. These principles help clinicians shift from reactive management to proactive oversight.
In addition, education emphasizes the importance of patient education and compliance as part of maintenance planning. When clinicians understand how design and communication intersect, they are better equipped to guide patients through realistic long-term expectations. By planning with maintenance in mind, clinicians reduce the likelihood of future complications, improve overall serviceability, and support outcomes that remain stable, manageable, and predictable throughout the lifespan of the restoration.
Safe clinical growth depends on pacing complexity alongside experience rather than advancing too quickly into unfamiliar territory. Education supports this by reinforcing structured progression and helping clinicians build confidence gradually instead of relying on trial-and-error learning.
Clinicians are encouraged to refine planning consistency, strengthen evaluation skills, and recognize the boundaries of their current competence. This includes learning when to simplify an approach, when to stage treatment, and when collaboration or referral represents the most responsible decision. These judgment-based skills are essential for reducing avoidable complications as experience grows.
Over time, structured development allows capabilities to expand responsibly. Skills are layered progressively, enabling clinicians to manage increasing complexity while maintaining patient safety as a central priority. This approach supports sustainable professional growth, reduces clinical stress, and helps clinicians maintain confidence grounded in experience rather than assumption.
Clear communication is essential when managing complex care, particularly when treatment involves multiple stages or long-term considerations. Education improves communication by helping clinicians articulate rationale, risks, and expectations with greater clarity and structure.
When clinicians understand the reasoning behind their decisions, they are better equipped to explain options and tradeoffs in language patients can understand. This supports informed consent, aligns expectations early, and reduces confusion or dissatisfaction later in the process.
Improved communication also strengthens trust. Patients who understand why decisions are made are more likely to feel confident in the plan and remain engaged throughout treatment and follow-up. This engagement supports better compliance, more effective maintenance, and ultimately more durable outcomes over time.
